Previous Posts


A conference called "Auckland's Future, Now" has just been held which received national media coverage. It was "hosted by Auckland Unlimited - the region's economic & cultural agency & an Auckland Council-controlled organization". It was attended by the PM, former PM's John Key & Helen Clark, as well as Mayor Goff, who all spoke.

For the record, we brought out the world's leading urban economist, Ed Glaeser, for a visit to NZ eight years ago (back in 2013) and organized for him to talk direct with Auckland Council at an event attended by the Mayor, as well as with a host of top politicians, from both the left and right, in Auckland & Wellington. I attended most of those meetings.

It turns out that every piece of advice that Glaeser gave to avoid the current housing affordability crisis, solve our transport problems and prepare Auckland to be a "city of the future" was ignored. Glaeser emphasized how essential is top notch education to help ensure urban success. High local education levels create a base from which more skilled workers can be attracted. They allow cities to bounce back more quickly from adverse shocks:

Interviewer: "So Singapore's number one ranking in education is not a coincidence".

Edward Glaeser: "It's not a coincidence. Right. Good cities invest hard in their education as well. Obviously, the economic miracle of Singapore is pretty great. And that's part of it, right? I mean, part of effective cities and part of thinking that we want cities to enable children to make better lives for themselves is making sure that they have the right educational institutions .."

However, I couldn't find a single reference to the quality of school education in Auckland and how it can be improved in the entire "Auckland's Future, Now" programme. Since Glaeser's visit, NZ has plummeted further to become 2nd to bottom of the OECD league tables in terms of maths & science test scores at schools. Most top economists I talk to these days are saying that since so little was done back at the time of Glaeser's visit to start addressing Auckland's problems, the scale & complexity of the issues have now become so immense, they are increasingly verging on becoming intractable.


  • Robert MacCulloch

The National Party Spokesperson, Andrew Bayly was interviewed by the Herald today during which he outlined the party's economic strategy. The reporter asked "So what is National's answer?". Not through tax increases, [Bayly] says. He would cut wasteful spending and focus on policies that improved growth. "Where we need to go over the next couple of years is invest where we need to invest", he says. "That means vulnerable people and supporting businesses because the only way out of this quagmire is an economic growth story".

Most economists would agree that supporting vulnerable people is important, but since when is supporting businesses through public investment also important, unless he's referring to infrastructure? Is he also suggesting that corporate welfare and transfers of public money to private industry is an objective of his party? As for infrastructure, National so woefully underinvested in it when they were in power that it has practically precipitated a crisis.

He describes the qualities of a good Finance Minister, as well. "You have to be miserable and tough if you have to be because everyone wants to spend money .. It's the same in business", he says alluding to his banking career [and] his startup companies ....

That being said, there's a big difference between being a CEO and leading a country. A CEO is essentially a "central planner" for their organization. But the job of a public leader, at least as finance is concerned, is to establish a set of rules that govern behavior and then let individual business leaders make the decisions that are best for their company.




Thanks for submitting!


Robert MacCulloch