top of page
Search
  • rmacculloch

Is ACT libertarian on non-economic issues & socialist on economic ones? Looks (quite a bit) like it.

When it comes to non-economic, moral issues, ACT regularly shows off its "libertarian" credentials. For example, the party lobbied hard & successfully in favor of end-of-life-choice legislation. Its' leader, David Seymour, has said he favors legalization of cannabis & the party speaks out frequently in favor of "freedom of speech". Yes, liberty of choice reigns.


Or does it? When it comes to economics, the party of Richard Prebble & Sir Roger Douglas has now abandoned many of it pro-market principles & instead morphed into advocating good old fashioned socialism in some crucial policy areas. It may take you aback to hear that claim, so here's some evidence.


Let's look at health-care, which is the single biggest item of government spending. Many of the best health systems in the world are based around the concept of universal health-care, implemented by way of social insurance schemes (that pool risks). The majority of providers in these systems are private, often non-for-profits. The patient (& GP) have the freedom - the liberty - to choose the best, highest quality place to go. That choice can be a private, or a public, supplier. Regardless of type, the bill is paid for by social insurance. Under these systems, the money follows the patient. Under our system, it's the other way around.


Is the pro choice, pro freedom-to-choose health-care system the one that the ACT Party supports, given it's meant to be a party with pro-market, libertarian principles?


No. Instead, this is their health policy: “ACT’s commitment is to remove the Māori Health Authority & turn policy away from Labour’s race obsession. Instead, we should be focused on the best public services that get results for NZ'ers from every background, including Māori.”


So what is this policy? It's about promoting a State-owned, socialized health-care system, one focused on "public services", provided by public providers. Yes, the Party wants a big, inefficient State-run health-care system - just one that doesn't have a Māori Health Authority. As such, there's nothing in ACT's health-care policy that would solve the problems in the Kiwi health system today. Nothing that would improve quality, nor increase efficiency. The Party is simply trying to muster votes on health-care by playing the race card.


Why doesn't ACT have the imagination to propose a pro-market policy that encourages private (non-for-profit) health-care providers to offer services - Māori and non-Māori alike - whereby folks are given the choice of where to go? That kind of system would ensure high quality providers expanded and low quality ones disappeared. Such a system would require health-care services to be transparently priced.


But no, not only is ACT copying Labour's tax policies, they're also copying Labour's health-care policies, minus the Māori Health Authority. Yes, ACT are now "libertarian" primarily only with respect to non-economic issues.

Yorumlar


bottom of page