top of page
  • rmacculloch

DownToEarth Kiwi reported earlier on the large government grants being poured into certain Queenstown businesses under the auspices of the"Strategic Tourism Assets Protection Program". The applicants to these grants no doubt argued that demand for their services was plummeting.

But is it? Yesterday it was reported that "Thousands of domestic visitors have hit Queenstown’s skifields during the past two weeks, with 'unheard' of numbers crowding some slopes at times. NZSki chief executive Paul Anderson said Coronet Peak and The Remarkables were seeing upwards of 7000 visitors a day during the school holidays, peaking last Friday at 10,000 – the busiest day he had seen in his seven years with the company. Last year during school holidays we had about 40 per cent Australians. We thought we would lose that. Kiwis have [replaced] the Australians.”

It appears that large numbers of Kiwis are substituting their overseas holidays for domestic holidays. Just goes to show how careful one has to be before spending millions of dollars in subsidies to businesses that could have otherwise been spent, for example, on more quarantine facilities to enable Kiwis to return to their homeland. What's the moral of the story? In times of crisis, one needs to prioritize spending.


  • rmacculloch

The biggest single reform NZ could make that would likely have the largest positive effect on many of the ideals which our country champions, such as lessening inequality, reducing poverty and increasing productivity would be ... to shift large parts of the government bureaucracy out of Wellington. The capital city, where Parliament resides, should still be kept as Wellington, but many civil servants should be moved out.

This debate is presently raging in the UK, where there is even a question mark over whether the House of Lords will remain sitting in London, or move to York. The Cabinet Office Minister, Mr Gove, said major changes to the civil service were needed to tackle "group think". These comments ring even more true in NZ. In my own experience, Wellington has become a "beltway" city. This term is used in America to refer to the insularity of Washington. The bureaucrats in our capital city have become estranged from the people.

Many of those in the Wellington civil service lack commercial expertise. Government departments are recruiting in their own image. There needs to be a broader and deeper pool of decision-makers, spread more widely across the country. Group think can affect any organisation - the tendency to coalesce around a cosy consensus, resist challenge, look for information which confirms existing biases and reject rigorous testing of delivery.

Northland and Auckland are where many of the social problems in NZ are concentrated, yet Wellington is a world away. Queenstown is where our tourism industry is focused, yet Wellington is a world away. Rather than ask for money under the auspices of the "provincial growth fund", politicians like Shane Jones may do better by pushing for swathes of the civil service to be moved out of Wellington to provinces, closer to the real needs of the people.

DownToEarth Kiwi concurs with the British Government's view that "more diversity in recruitment and emphasis on mathematical and scientific skills was key to making officials more responsive to the public's needs". Our civil servants are particularly weak on maths, statistics and probability, skills all fundamental to implementing "evidence-based" policy. Statistics NZ couldn't even run a census! On diversity, Wellington talks the talk but doesn't walk the walk. A large swathe of Kiwis simply do not want to live in Wellington, so the pool of applicants to jobs there is highly selective.

I know it is unlikely to ever happen. Wellington civil servants who read this blog will be amused by the suggestion, yet go back to their dinner parties with friends from other government departments. Back to their group think.

For the British view, see:

Home: Blog2


Thanks for submitting!


Robert MacCulloch

bottom of page