Why the relentless bias? A 1News Verian Poll, in which the exact survey question was not made available, got reported as follows by OneNews, "Poll: More New Zealanders oppose than support Treaty Principles Bill. The poll, which surveyed 1006 eligible voters .. found 23% supported the bill while 36% were opposed. A slightly larger group - 39% - said they didn't know enough about the bill, and 2% preferred not to say". At the bottom of the article One News stated that the question asked, "Do you support, or oppose, the bill; not know enough to say; or prefer not to say" . Where to start? Survey questions and responses are one of my fields in economics. First, the survey question could not have asked, "Do you support or oppose the bill or not know enough to say?" because that line doesn't reference which bill. Each word matters in survey questions, so what exactly did it ask?
Second, I do not interpret the survey results in such a way that, "more NZers oppose than support the Treaty Principles Bill". How on earth can one draw that conclusion when 41% of respondents replied saying they either want to know more about the debate, or prefer not to say? If you add that number to the 23% who are opposed, then who knows how many Kiwis are falling on the side of support - or opposition - to the Bill. Potentially 64% may turn out supporting the Bill (=23 % + 41%) should those who want to learn more about it end up in support. Indeed, the entire point of the debate ACT Leader Seymour has started is to persuade that 41% of undecided folks they should throw their support behind his Bill. Why can't our State Media just report the news, rather than putting their stupid anti-right spin on every story, in this case that Kiwis are lining up against ACT's bill in majority numbers, when there is no proof? Just report the actual goddam survey question & actual goddam answers next time, and leave the interpretation to the readers, rather than assuming we are all dumb.
Sources:
