Previous Posts

Search
  • Robert MacCulloch

As we know, well-being economics has been having a big influence on policy-making in this country and subjective surveys are being increasingly used by our government to guide its decisions.


Yesterday, America's cup winner Peter Burling missed the Gold. His co-sailor, Blair Tuke, said "On the Olympic podium in London, we saw people not enjoying the silver medals or being disappointed ... we said 'let's not be those people, if that ever happens', so we'll hold our heads high and enjoy this one."


This phenomenon of unhappy silver medalists has long been recognized, including by Scientific American Magazine. Researchers took video footage of the 1992 Summer Olympics in Barcelona. Specifically, they recorded the medal ceremonies, as well as footage from the athletic competitions immediately following announcements of the winners. The happiness of the medalists was rated on a 10-point scale, with 1 being “agony” and 10 being “ecstasy.” On average, silver medalists scored a 4.8, and bronze medalists a 7.1 ... Statistical analyses proved that both immediately after winning, as well as later at the medal ceremony, bronze medalists were visibly happier than the silver medalists.


Another study at the 2004 Athens Olympics found that none of the silver medalists smiled immediately after their match ended. More interestingly, the facial expressions that were recorded among silver medal winners ranged from sadness (43%) to contempt (14%) to nothing (29%). These results seem to have emerged at the Tokyo Olympics as well. Take a look at the facial expressions yourself.


Sources:

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/thoughtful-animal/why-bronze-medalists-are-happier-than-silver-winners/


According to data released just a few months ago in May, the RBNZ was predicting the unemployment rate would stay the same throughout 2021/22 at 4.7%. (See Table 6.5 on page 46 of their Monetary Policy Statement below). As a result of this forecast, the Monetary Policy Committee observed how "unemployment remains above its pre-COVID-19 levels" and decided to maintain "the current stimulatory level of monetary settings in order to meet its consumer price inflation and employment objectives".


However yesterday Stats NZ reported that the unemployment rate is instead at 4.0%, below where it was in the middle of 2019. The RBNZ got it all wrong. Now in the middle of the biggest loosening of monetary conditions in the history of the country, the Reserve Bank has become the Reverse Bank and the talk suddenly is of a tightening. The effects of the choking of the labour market caused by closed borders and vast skill shortages reported up and down the country, on top of the reckless $100 billion Quantitative Easing Program, appear to have been obvious to everyone except for the managers at the RBNZ.


And if MP's like Chloe Swarbrick and Nicola Willis thought RBNZ forecast errors regards house prices were bad, this one is even bigger since its of the order of nearly 20% (that is, 0.7/4.0). By the way, this comment is made without the benefit of hindsight - the situation was already clear in May which is why DownToEarth Kiwi commented on it back then.


Sources:

https://www.rbnz.govt.nz/-/media/ReserveBank/Files/Publications/Monetary%20policy%20statements/2021/mpsmay21.pdf?revision=40300a49-908c-49bc-8c22-f8289db90933


https://www.downtoearth.kiwi/post/the-reserve-bank-versus-the-anz


 

SUBSCRIBE

Thanks for submitting!

CONTACT

Robert MacCulloch