top of page

When Grant Robertson announced his resignation from Parliament, Jacinda Ardern put on Instagram that one of his great achievements was the "establishment of the well-being framework". That framework was actually established by my friend, Girol Karacaoglu, former Chief Economist at the NZ Treasury when John Key was PM & National was in power. He released a paper describing the framework in 2015. All Ardern & Robertson did was pick up on the word "well-being" and put it into their "comms", PR & marketing. They dropped the word into some legislation to try to make themselves look good. Girol asked me for advice on the framework even before 2015, way before the rise of Ardern & Robertson. Bill English, who was Finance Minister at the time, didn't want to promote Girol's work. That's the history. Ardern is taking credit for something she did not do. Arguing you established something when all you did was get PR people & speech-writers to use the word in your comms is a bit rich. Ardern has to get more honest about her role in history - she was a Great Communicator, a phrase used to describe Ronald Reagan. She invented nothing.

Here are the people responsible for helping Girol establish the framework, as listed in his acknowledgments: I wish to thank the following individuals for their comments and feedback on the first version of this paper - without in any way implying their endorsement: Jean-Pierre Andre, Joey Au, Geoff Bertram, Hilary Blake, Romina Boarini, Jonathan Boston, Nick Carroll, Kristie Carter, Andrew Coleman, Diane Coyle, Eric Crampton, Paul Dalziel, Shamubeel Eaqub, Brian Easton, Hans-Jurgen Engelbrecht, Lew Evans, Roger Fairclough, Martin Fukac, David Galt, Margaret Galt, Arthur Grimes, Oliver Hartwich, Gary Hawke, Seamus Hogan, Andrew Jackson, Adam Jaffe, Jacek Krawczyk, Robert MacCulloch, Wayne Mills, Jamie Murray, Patrick Nolan, Les Oxley, Weshah Razzak, Chris Ritchie, Paul Rodway, James Roumasset, Michael Ryan, Grant Scobie, Graham Scott, Conal Smith, Robert Stratford, Adolph Stroombergen, Ken Warren, Bryce Wilkinson, John Yeabsley. I also benefited from discussions at the New Zealand Treasury’s Living Standards Group meetings and two workshops, one at the New Zealand Treasury and the other at the New Zealand Productivity Commission.


Air NZ is complaining that Auckland Airport is a monopoly - passing on capital expenditure charges arising from its airport re-development to the airline. Not to be outdone, Auckland Airport is firing back - saying Air NZ's monopoly over domestic air travel is one of the most powerful in the world and the airline wants a small crappy airport to stop more competitors. Who's the dummy loser in this fight between two big fatties, neither of which is constrained by market discipline? You and me, of course. We're the ones paying and queueing.

Many years ago when Bill English was Finance Minister and had an "Academic Advisory Group" for awhile that I used to attend, he turned to me once and asked, "Oh, so you're from Auckland University - is that a University or a property development company?". I thought it was a hilarious line - then started thinking maybe he had a point. The reason was that a decade ago the University was doing huge property developments & the bosses were pre-occupied tearing down buildings, buying and selling land, like in Newmarket, Auckland, and building new stuff, all to enhance the on-campus experience. Not a bad aim. But that was before Covid, before students were told to go off and study online. The reason for this diversion is that we should be asking the same question about Auckland Airport - is the company actually running an Airport, or is it in the mall, parking & property development businesses, which are way more profitable than helping passengers get on and off planes?

This is no joke and is the subject of great debate in the US, where traditional malls in cities are declining due to online shopping, but where retail sales at airports are booming. Slate Magazine report, "Your Misery at the Airport Is Great for Business: Retail in terminals is booming". It rose from $4 billion in the US in 2015 to $10 billion in 2020, a 20% compound growth rate. The reason is fascinating - airports supply the greatest desire of physical retail: foot traffic. Outside them, people can go through their days without having to pass a shop window. But in airports every passenger has to walk past dozens of them. There are other ways the misery of flyers brings joy to airport retail. Delays mean more money spent in airport shops. On many flights, airlines now supply little to eat or drink. So restaurants at airports are thriving. People are stressed & anxious at airports, so spas & massage shops have become popular there too.

I'm siding with Air NZ, which I have a soft spot for - maybe Auckland Airport has secretly decided its main aim is to make money out of retail sales from travelers, and is spending a truck load of money on that kind of development whilst not helping Air NZ, nor our nation, give tourists from other countries, our biggest export earner, a good experience of the actual travelling and queueing part of their arrival in NZ. Auckland Airport is bolstering its monopoly profits whilst hurting the image of our nation.


Home: Blog2


Thanks for submitting!


Robert MacCulloch

bottom of page