In 2023 our Ministry of Education employed 4,311 people, up from 2,630 in 2017 when Ardern, Robertson and Hipkins first came to power. How have they defined "art" to our youth? The NZ Curriculum states on page 20:
"What are the arts about? The arts are powerful forms of expression that recognize, value, and contribute to the unique bicultural and multicultural character of Aotearoa New Zealand, enriching the lives of all New Zealanders".
Since when are the arts tied to a single nation? Since when is art only art to the extent it "values" one nation's unique character? Since when should artists have any interest at all in the nation in which they live? Doesn't much art transcend national boundaries & can be appreciated by humans the world over since it gives expression to fundamental human truths & the nature of reality? Do Wellington Ministry staffers live in a world so closed, so parochial that they've now mislead our children into thinking art is so limited, so chokingly parochial that unless it is connected to "valuing" NZ culture then it cannot be art. Is our Education Ministry's conception of art the bucket fountain on Cuba Mall?
Picasso is quoted as saying, "Art is a lie that makes us realize truth". How does his definition value NZ's "unique" character? Oscar Wilde said, "Art is the most intense mode of individualism the world has known". Maybe valuing the life of the country in which they live is the last thing on the mind of an artist? Da Vinci stated ‘art is the Queen of all sciences communicating knowledge to all generations of the world’. Even centuries ago he had the insight to realize that art was not about valuing & recognizing just Italy. Abolish the Education Ministry for putting in writing a definition of art that is enough to turn NZ school children off art and close their minds to its soaring influence on all of humanity.
Sources: